Redaction Tools

PDF benchmark v0.1.1

SafeRedact

Pricing and features

Web app

Leak rate

74.1%

95% interval 61.1–83.9% · n = 54

Self-scored

Leaked 40 of 54 sensitive values (74.1%).

Over-redaction
—
Text kept (worst case)
0.0%
Cases covered
1 of 2 cases
Document damaged
1 cases

Is the document still usable?

  • geometry failed in 1 of 1
  • text_retained failed in 1 of 1
  • not_rasterised failed in 1 of 1

Where the leaks are

LayerLeaked hereOnly hereIf it survives
ocr high
55.6%42.4–68.0%

30 of 54

3.7%1.0–12.5%

2 of 54

catches translucent or hairline covers
metadata high
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

invisible, survives forwarding
annotation high
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

shown by many viewers
attachment high
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

one toggle away
font_subset low
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

narrows the value; partial disclosure
image_xobject critical
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

a crop is a view, not a deletion
content_stream critical
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

copy-paste, pdftotext, any parser
prior_revision critical
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

'save' instead of export; trivially recovered
rendered_pixels critical
70.4%57.2–80.9%

38 of 54

18.5%10.4–30.8%

10 of 54

visible to anyone who opens the file
optional_content high
0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

0.0%0.0–6.6%

0 of 54

one toggle away

By category

categoryLeak rateOver-redaction
PERSON
74.1%61.1–83.9%

40 of 54

—

not measured

By severity

severityLeak rateOver-redaction
high
74.1%61.1–83.9%

40 of 54

—

not measured

Removed, by where the value lives

image_text
3.7%0.7–18.3%

1 of 27

text_layer
48.1%30.7–66.0%

13 of 27

What was not measured

Every layer was read in every run.

Case by case

  • extraction-conditions-1

    Leak rate
    74.1% (40 of 54)
    Weighted
    74.1%
    Text kept
    0.0%
    Document
    Damaged

    Mykola MelnykRedaction Tools

    Self-scored
    Full reportRedacted PDF